Monthly Archives: March 2008

Who’s your city?

City 

The book: Who’s Your City?: How the Creative Economy Is Making Where You Live the Most Important Decision of Your Life
Author: Richard Florida
Genre: Economics

The economist Richard Florida of Creative Class fame has written a seriously readworthy book about the importance of where you live. Basically, Florida demonstrates that your decision of which city or region to live in has a tremendous impact on the rest of your life, from your career to your life satisfaction and who you marry.

The idea that place is important is not new. For instance, economists have long since realised that cities, amongst other functions, also act like market mechanisms for dating. Who you meet determines who you eventually marry, so obviously your choice to live in New York will increase the chances that you marry, say, a banker or a neurotic artist. What sets Florida apart is his solidly grounded research into the subject of place; every major claim is backed up by reams of data. Mercifully, the data aspect is not overdone in the book – it reads considerably better than his first, famous book, The Rise of the Creative Class

In the latter part of the book, Florida also provides information to help the reader make informed choices about where to live. Also, another interesting finding from Who’s your city is that Florida mapped out where people of different personality types have chosen to live (as measured on the classic Big Five personality model). In an entirely unsurprising turn of events, pretty much all of the neurotic people seems to live in Manhattan.

Highly recommended.

The science of personality

Personality 

The book: Personality: What Makes You the Way You Are
Author: Daniel Nettle
Genre: Popular psychology

How much has your personality been influenced by your parents and the home you grew up in? And similarly, how much influence does your own personality exert on that of your kids? The answer – because there is one – may surprise you; see further down.

Your personality is mostly stable thoughout your life, and most scientists of the subject employ the so-called Big Five model, which measures five core aspects of your personality: extraversion, neuroticism, agreeableness, conscentiousness, and openness to experience. In Personality, Daniel Nettle, who also committed a good book on the subject of happiness research, explains these five factors and provides a few self-test tools for the narcissistic curious reader.

While a good read, the book has one drawback; for each factor, Nettle also wants to give an account for the factor’s evolutionary raison d’etre, which is interesting but a bit unnecessary. This should not keep you from reading it, however – especially chapter 8 is worth the price of the book alone.

And the answer to the question that I opened up with? Parents have ZERO influence on the personality type of their kids. Zero as in none whatsoever - the personality of children is simply not measurably affected by their parents or the type of home they grow up in.

This finding is highly counterintuitive, and as you read this, you are probably thinking that it can’t be right; your own experience tells you differently. But the research has extremely strong empirical proof behind it, built on numerous studies of both adopted children and of identical twins that were reared apart. Which gives me an occasion to post the oft-cited first stanza of Philip Larkin‘s well-known poem, This be the verse:

They fuck you up, your mom and dad
They may not mean to, but they do.
They fill you with the faults they had
And add some extra, just for you.

Well, as it turns out, Larkin was wrong. Parents of the world, consider yourself vindicated.

More science on happiness

Happiness hypo

The book: The Happiness Hypothesis: Putting Ancient Wisdom to the Test of Modern Science
Author: Jonathan Haidt
Genre: Popular science/psychology

Another good book that explores the recent research into the subject of happiness. I have already recommended one book on this subject, but wanted to mention this one as well, as it is very well writtten and a bit more accessible than Nettle’s book. Also, in an interesting twist on the genre, it includes – and critically evaluates – the old sources of wisdom (Buddha, etc.), comparing their advice to what we know from modern research.